After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these systems. Out of lie recognition tools examined at the line to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being included in asylum applications. This article explores just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to browse through these systems and to go after their right for coverage.

It also shows how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from being able to access the stations of protection. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms for these technologies, through which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double impact: while they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and www.ascella-llc.com/counseling-services-for-students/ ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.